Systematic reviews, with critical appraisal of the literature, remain the gold standard in finding evidence for health protection guidance.

However the development of evidence-based guidelines (EBG) through the systematic review process is resource intensive.

There are situations where a rapid review would be preferable, for example, for many reactive questions in public health and health protection.

In this situation, condensed versions of the full systematic review or ‘rapid reviews’, where the review methodology is shortened in one or several ways and is more targeted, may be more appropriate.

General enquiries

If you have an enquiry relating to this publication, please email .

Media enquiries

If you have a media enquiry relating to this publication, please contact the Communications and Engagement team.

Requesting other formats and reporting issues

If you require publications or documents in other formats, please email phs.otherformats@phs.scot.

To report any issues with a publication, please email phs.generalpublications@phs.scot.

Last updated: 21 March 2024
Was this page helpful?